XRSM
From IUCG - Internet Users Contributing Group
- Thematic Moderator(s):
- Secretariat user:secretariat
- Theme:
- XRSM
- Extended Relational Spaces Model
- Associated Mailing List:
- iucg@ietf.org
- Subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iucg
- Associated Site:
- Mailing list Facilitator(s):
- Jefsey Morfin user:Jefsey_Morfin
The XRSM is an attempt to describe a general comprehension of the semiotic digital facilitation integration, i.e. the way the different convergent digital (Internet) and emergent semantic (Intersem) components contribute to human networked relations.
.
Contents |
Linguistic elements
Semiotic modelling may be approached in a first step through linguistic modelling.
Linguistics
Linguistic is the science whose goal is to apprehend language through the diversity of natural languages. Languages are only accessible throught texts, that is, through patterns of markers which are themselves traces of underlying operations.
- languages are not irreductably specifics: they share invariants which found and regulate language activity. These invariants can be categories, schemata, relations, primitive terms, operations, operation sequences, etc.
- there is no term to term correspondance. There is therefore the need for calling on conceptual metadata to progress towards similar notions throughout different natural languages. This is the field of metalinguistics.
- multilinguistics is the discipline whose concern is the specific support of the multilateralty of the linguistic diversity. Digitalization and globalization make it a important field of development.
Character sets
When humans want to convey a meaning, a thought, a model, etc. they use markers. In texts they call on the contribution of a very large number of pragmatic connotations and mediatic artifacts. One class of these artifacts are the signs of the character set attached to the natural language of their relational space. It comes with all all the context, rules, mechanism, and environment that will be referenced to or implied in its uterance operations.
If that character set is deemed as stable (*), it means that it experimentally represents the necessary scriptural bandwidth to carry every semantics that locutors may want to express and alocutors need to understand, within the pragmatic context of that natural language (syntax, grammar, metalanguage, metadata, usage, historical back-ground, etc.).
(*) stable does not mean fixed. New semantic or pragmatic circumstances may lead a relational space to extend its character set, in particular reference to the mathematic catastrophe theory may be fruitful.
Human marker sets
There are many other sorts of markers. From gestures, behaviors, sounds, signs, symbols, logo, etc.
Architexts
One of the multilinguistic aspect is the internal structural management (architexture) of texts, that adds presentation to prosody, syntax, semantics and pragmatics. This area has known a wide development with printing and now with word processing, and mark-up languages.
Lingualization pile
The semantic digital support (carrying a same meaning in different linguistic contexts)calls for a layered progression of services depending on the situation.
